Rationality, markets, and morals: RMM Band 3 (2012)https://jlupub.ub.uni-giessen.de//handle/jlupub/3642024-03-29T08:29:20Z2024-03-29T08:29:20ZMichael Laver and Ernest Sergenti: Party Competition. An Agent-Based ModelZschache, Johanneshttps://jlupub.ub.uni-giessen.de//handle/jlupub/4622022-03-15T14:52:41Z2012-01-01T00:00:00ZMichael Laver and Ernest Sergenti: Party Competition. An Agent-Based Model
Zschache, Johannes
2012-01-01T00:00:00ZGerald Gaus: The Order of Public Reason— A Theory of Freedom and Morality in a Diverse and Bounded WorldSchüssler, Rudolfhttps://jlupub.ub.uni-giessen.de//handle/jlupub/4612022-03-15T14:52:38Z2012-01-01T00:00:00ZGerald Gaus: The Order of Public Reason— A Theory of Freedom and Morality in a Diverse and Bounded World
Schüssler, Rudolf
2012-01-01T00:00:00ZNames and GamesSenn, Stephenhttps://jlupub.ub.uni-giessen.de//handle/jlupub/4602022-03-15T14:52:42Z2012-01-01T00:00:00ZNames and Games
Senn, Stephen
2012-01-01T00:00:00ZThe Strength of Weak AffectsBaurmann, Michaelhttps://jlupub.ub.uni-giessen.de//handle/jlupub/4592022-03-15T14:52:44Z2012-01-01T00:00:00ZThe Strength of Weak Affects
Baurmann, Michael
2012-01-01T00:00:00ZHow Can We Cultivate Senn’s Ability?Mayo, Deborah G.https://jlupub.ub.uni-giessen.de//handle/jlupub/4582022-03-15T14:52:39Z2012-01-01T00:00:00ZHow Can We Cultivate Senn’s Ability?
Mayo, Deborah G.
2012-01-01T00:00:00ZLearning to Be Different: Quantitative Research in Economics and Political ScienceLibman, Alexanderhttps://jlupub.ub.uni-giessen.de//handle/jlupub/4572022-03-15T14:52:43Z2012-01-01T00:00:00ZLearning to Be Different: Quantitative Research in Economics and Political Science
Libman, Alexander
The comment addresses the subtle differences that exist between economics and political science in terms of how the standards for the empirical quantitative research are set. It shows that the common methodology is applied by the disciplines in a different fashion. These differences could become obstacles for communication, but could also provide fruitful background for discussion of disciplines, if one explicitly takes them into account.
2012-01-01T00:00:00ZAffective Social Ties—Missing Link in Governance Theoryvan Winden, Franshttps://jlupub.ub.uni-giessen.de//handle/jlupub/4562022-03-15T14:52:45Z2012-01-01T00:00:00ZAffective Social Ties—Missing Link in Governance Theory
van Winden, Frans
Although governance is about interpersonal relationships, it appears that the antecedents and consequences of affective bonds (social ties) in social groups dealing with commonpool resources and public goods have been neglected. The welfare costs of the neglect of such bonds and their dynamic properties in economics are unclear but may be substantial. In this paper, I discuss a theoretical `dual process' social ties model and the behavioral experimental and recent neurological evidence this model has obtained. Furthermore, a number of implications and institutional issues are addressed.
2012-01-01T00:00:00ZThe Renegade Subjectivist: José Bernardo’s Reference BayesianismSprenger, Janhttps://jlupub.ub.uni-giessen.de//handle/jlupub/4552022-03-15T14:52:40Z2012-01-01T00:00:00ZThe Renegade Subjectivist: José Bernardo’s Reference Bayesianism
Sprenger, Jan
This article motivates and discusses José Bernardo's attempt to reconcile the subjective Bayesian framework with a need for objective scientific inference, leading to a special kind of objective Bayesianism, namely reference Bayesianism. We elucidate principal ideas and foundational implications of Bernardo's approach, with particular attention to the classical problem of testing a precise null hypothesis against an unspecified alternative.
2012-01-01T00:00:00ZThe SES Framework in a Marine Setting: Methodological LessonsSchlüter, AchimMadrigal, Rógerhttps://jlupub.ub.uni-giessen.de//handle/jlupub/4542022-03-15T14:52:42Z2012-01-01T00:00:00ZThe SES Framework in a Marine Setting: Methodological Lessons
Schlüter, Achim; Madrigal, Róger
The paper discusses the application of Elinor Ostrom's Social Ecological Systems (SES) framework, using as example a community organization in Costa Rica, which collectively extracts turtle eggs. The paper does so with the particular aim of examining the coevolving relationship between political science and economics. The SES framework is understood as a useful exploratory tool, which was introduced into a joint research agenda from a political science perspective. The breadth of its approach enables it to capture empirically observable diversity. In this sense it provided a perfect complement to the more partial view that economics brought into the coevolving research process.
2012-01-01T00:00:00ZCoevolving Relationships between Political Science and EconomicsOstrom, Elinorhttps://jlupub.ub.uni-giessen.de//handle/jlupub/4532022-03-15T14:52:39Z2012-01-01T00:00:00ZCoevolving Relationships between Political Science and Economics
Ostrom, Elinor
During the last 50 years, at least four interdisciplinary developments have occurred at the boundaries of political science and economics that have affected the central questions that both political scientists and economists ask, the empirical evidence amassed as a new foundation for understanding political economies, and new questions for future research. These include: (1) the Public Choice Approach, (2) the Governance of the Commons debate, (3) New Institutional Economics, and (4) Behavioral Approaches to Explaining Human Actions. In this short essay, I briefly review the challenges that these approaches have brought to political science and some of the general findings stimulated by these approaches before identifying some of the major issues on the contemporary agenda.
2012-01-01T00:00:00Z