| dc.contributor.author | Lahno, Bernd | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-12-08T17:32:25Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-12-08T17:32:25Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2009 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://jlupub.ub.uni-giessen.de//handle/jlupub/404 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.22029/jlupub-337 | |
| dc.description.abstract | A basic conviction in moral non-cognitivism is: only hypothetical norms may be justified. Hartmut Kliemt argues for a moderate variant: there are only hypothetical justifications of norms whether the norms are hypothetical or categorical in kind. In this paper the concept of `hypothetical justification' is analyzed. It is argued that hypothetical justifications are not of the kind that we should look for in normative ethics. | de_DE |
| dc.language.iso | en | de_DE |
| dc.subject.ddc | ddc:100 | de_DE |
| dc.subject.ddc | ddc:330 | de_DE |
| dc.title | Hypothetical Justifications | de_DE |
| dc.type | article | de_DE |
| dcterms.isPartOf | 2536124-7 | |
| local.affiliation | Externe Einrichtungen | de_DE |
| local.source.spage | 67 | de_DE |
| local.source.epage | 82 | de_DE |
| local.source.journaltitle | Rationality, markets, and morals: RMM | de_DE |
| local.source.volume | 0 | de_DE |
