Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBühler, Axel
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-08T17:36:25Z
dc.date.available2021-12-08T17:36:25Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.urihttps://jlupub.ub.uni-giessen.de//handle/jlupub/405
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.22029/jlupub-338
dc.description.abstractAn individualistic social ontology attributes mental states merely to individuals, and denies the existence of collective attitudes such as we-intentions. Furthermore, if collectives cannot be bearers of minds, then collective mental states cannot serve as explanatory factors. In my paper, I first show that we-intentions do serve considerable explanatory purposes within developmental psychology. I then propose an account of weintentions as complexes of intentions of different individuals. These intentions are of a distinct kind: de-re-intentions, grounded in external objects in a specific situation. This grounding is achieved by embodied cognition, through appropriate senso-motoric activities. I conclude that my account of we-intentions is compatible with an individualistic social ontology.de_DE
dc.language.isodede_DE
dc.subject.ddcddc:100de_DE
dc.subject.ddcddc:330de_DE
dc.titleWir-Absichten in der individualistischen Sozialontologiede_DE
dc.typearticlede_DE
dcterms.isPartOf2536124-7
local.affiliationExterne Einrichtungende_DE
local.source.spage83de_DE
local.source.epage93de_DE
local.source.journaltitleRationality, markets, and morals: RMMde_DE
local.source.volume0de_DE


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record