Liebe Nutzerinnen und Nutzer in der Zeit von Montag 22.04. 9:00Uhr bis voraussichtlich Mitwoch 24.04. 9:00Uhr ist JLUpub aufgrund von Wartungsarbeiten nicht erreichbar. Danke für Ihr Verständnis. Dear users, JLUpub will be unavailable from Monday 22.04. 9:00 a.m. until probably Wednesday 24.04. 9:00 a.m. due to maintenance work. Thank you for your understanding.

Zur Kurzanzeige

dc.contributor.authorPincione, Guido
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-08T19:51:41Z
dc.date.available2021-12-08T19:51:41Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.urihttps://jlupub.ub.uni-giessen.de//handle/jlupub/426
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.22029/jlupub-359
dc.description.abstractWe often lack clear procedures for assessing statements and arguments advanced in everyday conversations, political campaigns, advertisements, and the other multifarious uses to which ordinary language can be put. Critical thinking is a method for evaluating arguments couched in ordinary, non-formal language. Legal education should foster this argumentative skill as an ability to assess the open-end variety of arguments that may arise in legal disputes. I will argue that the ability of critical thinking helps lawyers to thrive even in legal cultures that are hostile to critical thinking. There is, therefore, a happy harmony between professional and moral reasons to teach critical thinking at law schools: it promotes epistemic as well as instrumental rationality.de_DE
dc.language.isoende_DE
dc.subject.ddcddc:100de_DE
dc.subject.ddcddc:330de_DE
dc.titleCritical Thinking and Legal Culturede_DE
dc.typearticlede_DE
dcterms.isPartOf2536124-7
local.affiliationExterne Einrichtungende_DE
local.source.spage373de_DE
local.source.epage391de_DE
local.source.journaltitleRationality, markets, and morals: RMMde_DE
local.source.volume0de_DE


Dateien zu dieser Ressource

Thumbnail

Das Dokument erscheint in:

Zur Kurzanzeige