Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLübbe, Weyma
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-08T20:24:15Z
dc.date.available2021-12-08T20:24:15Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.urihttps://jlupub.ub.uni-giessen.de//handle/jlupub/432
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.22029/jlupub-365
dc.description.abstractEconomists, and notably health economists, very often add to their policy recommendations the formula ,from an economic point of view‘. The contribution starts by exploring what the message of this clause to non-economists might be. The vagueness that it brings about as to the general acceptability of claims to ,rational‘ allocation, ,best‘ outcomes etc. is then, first, assessed with respect to the recent debate about IQWiG’s (the German equivalent to Britain’s NICE) unorthodox methodology of health care evaluation. Weaknesses within the theoretical basis of standard health economist’s evaluations, well-known by theoretical economists but rarely mentioned when it comes to policy advice, are then, second, pointed out. Finally, some consequences are drawn for what has to be done to enhance the quality and impact of policy advice in the area of health resource allocation.de_DE
dc.description.sponsorshipSonstige Drittmittelgeber/-innende_DE
dc.language.isodede_DE
dc.subject.ddcddc:100de_DE
dc.subject.ddcddc:330de_DE
dc.title,Aus ökonomischer Sicht ...‘de_DE
dc.typearticlede_DE
dcterms.isPartOf2536124-7
local.affiliationExterne Einrichtungende_DE
local.source.spage451de_DE
local.source.epage463de_DE
local.source.journaltitleRationality, markets, and morals: RMMde_DE
local.source.volume0de_DE


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record