Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPeacock, Mark
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-10T14:14:56Z
dc.date.available2021-12-10T14:14:56Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.urihttps://jlupub.ub.uni-giessen.de//handle/jlupub/488
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.22029/jlupub-417
dc.description.abstractIn this Comment, I examine Christoph Hanisch's recent contribution to this journal. In commenting on Hanisch's essay, I offer an interpretation of Amartya Sen's notion of `commitment' which makes committed choices both uncontroversial and quotidian. This interpretation contrasts with those which see some of Sen's pronouncements on commitment to be obviously false, counterintuitive or psychologically impossible.de_DE
dc.language.isoende_DE
dc.subjectCommitmentde_DE
dc.subjectself-goal choicede_DE
dc.subjectAmartya Sende_DE
dc.subjectrational choicede_DE
dc.subject.ddcddc:100de_DE
dc.subject.ddcddc:330de_DE
dc.titleCommitment and Goalsde_DE
dc.typearticlede_DE
dcterms.isPartOf2536124-7
local.affiliationExterne Einrichtungende_DE
local.source.spage221de_DE
local.source.epage226de_DE
local.source.journaltitleRationality, markets, and morals: RMMde_DE
local.source.volume4de_DE


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record