dc.contributor.author | Peacock, Mark | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-12-10T14:14:56Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-12-10T14:14:56Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://jlupub.ub.uni-giessen.de//handle/jlupub/488 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.22029/jlupub-417 | |
dc.description.abstract | In this Comment, I examine Christoph Hanisch's recent contribution to this journal. In commenting on Hanisch's essay, I offer an interpretation of Amartya Sen's notion of `commitment' which makes committed choices both uncontroversial and quotidian. This interpretation contrasts with those which see some of Sen's pronouncements on commitment to be obviously false, counterintuitive or psychologically impossible. | de_DE |
dc.language.iso | en | de_DE |
dc.subject | Commitment | de_DE |
dc.subject | self-goal choice | de_DE |
dc.subject | Amartya Sen | de_DE |
dc.subject | rational choice | de_DE |
dc.subject.ddc | ddc:100 | de_DE |
dc.subject.ddc | ddc:330 | de_DE |
dc.title | Commitment and Goals | de_DE |
dc.type | article | de_DE |
dcterms.isPartOf | 2536124-7 | |
local.affiliation | Externe Einrichtungen | de_DE |
local.source.spage | 221 | de_DE |
local.source.epage | 226 | de_DE |
local.source.journaltitle | Rationality, markets, and morals: RMM | de_DE |
local.source.volume | 4 | de_DE |