JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
Liebe Nutzerinnen und Nutzer in der Zeit von Montag 22.04. 9:00Uhr bis voraussichtlich Mitwoch 24.04. 9:00Uhr ist JLUpub aufgrund von Wartungsarbeiten nicht erreichbar. Danke für Ihr Verständnis.
Dear users, JLUpub will be unavailable from Monday 22.04. 9:00 a.m. until probably Wednesday 24.04. 9:00 a.m. due to maintenance work. Thank you for your understanding.
Consent as the Foundation of Political Authority - A Lockean Perspective
The article focuses on the justification provided by classical contract theory for the right of states to enact laws and the corresponding obligation of political allegiance. At first the distinction between political authority and parental authority developed by John Locke in his seminal work "Two Treatises of Government" is explored. Thereafter ... it is discussed why the interests of individuals in the creation of a state fail to vindicate the exercise of governmental power. As regards David Hume's influential objections to contract theory, it is argued that the consent criterion of political legitimacy withstands his criticism. Hume cannot establish that the core idea of Locke's justificatory approach is wrong; he merely demonstrates that hardly any existing state meets the consent requirement. Finally the question is discussed which conditions a state must fulfil in order to be entitled to claim that its citizens tacitly approve of its authority.
Erstpublikation in
Rationality, markets, and morals: RMM 5 (2014), 64-78