Bock, Niko ChristianNiko ChristianBockKlaus, KatharinaKatharinaKlausLiebel, Moritz MaximilianMoritz MaximilianLiebelRuf, SabineSabineRufWöstmann, BerndBerndWöstmannSchlenz, Maximiliane AmelieMaximiliane AmelieSchlenz2023-05-312023-05-312023https://jlupub.ub.uni-giessen.de/handle/jlupub/16327http://dx.doi.org/10.22029/jlupub-15707This study aimed to investigate the transfer accuracy and required time for digital full-arch impressions obtained from intraoral scanners (IOSs) versus conventional alginate impressions (CAIs) in patients with multibracket appliances (MBA). Thirty patients with buccal MBAs (metal brackets, archwire removed) were examined using an established reference aid method. Impression-taking using four IOSs (Primescan, Trios 4, Medit i700, Emerald S) and one CAI with subsequent plaster casting were conducted. One-hundred-twenty (n = 30 x 4) scans were analyzed with 3D software (GOM Inspect) and 30 (n = 30 x 1) casts were assessed using a coordinate measurement machine. Six distances and six angles were measured and compared to the reference aid values (ANOVA; p < 0.05). Except for the intermolar distance, transfer accuracy was significantly higher with IOSs than with CAIs (p < 0.05). No such difference was found regarding the six angles. In patients with MBAs, digital impression-taking using IOSs can be recommended. For all measured variables except one, the transfer accuracy of IOSs was better than or at least equivalent to the data from CAIs. In addition, significantly (p < 0.001) less time was necessary for all IOSs in comparison to CAIs plus plaster casting.enNamensnennung 4.0 Internationalfull-arch impressionmultibracket applianceintraoral scannerdigital dentistryalginateaccuracyprecisiontruenessclinical studyreferenceddc:610