Güth, WernerWernerGüthKliemt, HartmutHartmutKliemt2021-12-082021-12-082013https://jlupub.ub.uni-giessen.de/handle/jlupub/467http://dx.doi.org/10.22029/jlupub-400Contrary to communitarian market criticism institutions relying on money and bidding can strengthen faculties of `self-governance'. Securing procedurally egalitarian bidding on the basis of declared monetary evaluations guarantees that all realized changes of a status quo are in an `objective' (pecuniary) sense equally advantageous for all members of the community. We show how to use this idea in the context of Elinor Ostrom type common(s) projects. Empirical evidence on `procedurally fair bidding' is presented. The practical scope and limits of procedural egalitarianism need further empirical exploration but money may be the best means to express moral values in `communitarian consent'.enFair ProceduresGoverning the CommonsCommunitarianismContractarianismEgalitarian MechanismsUnanimity‘Crowding out’ddc:100ddc:330