Peacock, MarkMarkPeacock2021-12-102021-12-102013https://jlupub.ub.uni-giessen.de/handle/jlupub/488http://dx.doi.org/10.22029/jlupub-417In this Comment, I examine Christoph Hanisch's recent contribution to this journal. In commenting on Hanisch's essay, I offer an interpretation of Amartya Sen's notion of `commitment' which makes committed choices both uncontroversial and quotidian. This interpretation contrasts with those which see some of Sen's pronouncements on commitment to be obviously false, counterintuitive or psychologically impossible.enCommitmentself-goal choiceAmartya Senrational choiceddc:100ddc:330