Scherr, AlexanderAlexanderScherr2022-09-122016-05-302022-09-1220162366-4142http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:hebis:26-opus-120606https://jlupub.ub.uni-giessen.de/handle/jlupub/7600http://dx.doi.org/10.22029/jlupub-7034This article argues that emergent emergencies in complex natural systems or eco-systems can be understood as the ethical consequences of cognitive failure or epis-temological error (Gregory Bateson). More specifically, I hold that complex systems display emergent behaviors, and that narrative cognition our human default way of making sense of the world is not particularly well suited for understanding emer-gence. Building on previous narratological work on the incompatibility of narrative and emergence (H. Porter Abbott, Richard Walsh), I argue further that narrative think-ing and complex systems are each characterized by distinct types of agency, or ways of conceptualizing agency. In its second half, the essay turns to Michael Crichton s classic Jurassic Park (1990), reading the novel as a fictional thought experiment which not only simulates an emergency situation, but also explores the reasons for the collapsing of the control system in the fictional theme park from the vantage of chaos theory. It will be shown that the emergent emergency staged in the novel is the result of cognitive failure on the part of the park managers, who are misled by a narrative of centralized control (Abbott) in their attempts to control the park and a reductionist conceptualization of life. Such reductionist approaches to life are contrasted with ecological frameworks in this article.1enNamensnennung 4.0 Internationalemergencenarrativenarrative cognitionecosystemecologychaos theoryJurassic Park (Michael Crichton)ddc:300