Koenig, Cornelius J.Cornelius J.KoenigKlehe, Ute-ChristineUte-ChristineKleheBerchtold, MatthiasMatthiasBerchtoldKleinmann, MartinMartinKleinmann2023-06-302012-01-042023-06-302010http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:hebis:26-opus-85323https://jlupub.ub.uni-giessen.de/handle/jlupub/17870http://dx.doi.org/10.22029/jlupub-17238The scientist practitioner gap in personnel selection is large. Thus, it is important to gain a better understanding of the reasons that make organizations use or not use certain selection procedures. Based on institutional theory, we predicted that six variables should determine the use of selection procedures: the procedures´ diffusion in the field, legal problems associated with the procedures, applicant reactions to the procedures, their usefulness for organizational self-promotion, their predictive validity, and the costs involved. To test these predictions, 506 HR professionals from the German-speaking part of Switzerland filled out an online survey on the selection procedures used in their organizations. Respondents also evaluated five procedures (semi-structured interviews, ability tests, personality tests, assessment centers, and graphology) on the six predictor variables. Multilevel logistic regression was used to analyze the data. The results revealed that the highest odd ratios belonged to the factors applicant reactions, costs, and diffusion. Lower (but significant) odds ratios belonged to the factors predictive validity, organizational self-promotion, and perceived legality.enIn Copyrightpersonnel selectionselection proceduresinstitutional theorypredictive validityddc:150