(Over-)Stylizing Experimental Findings and Theorizing with Sweeping Generality

dc.contributor.authorGüth, Werner
dc.contributor.authorKliemt, Hartmut
dc.contributor.authorLevati, M. Vittoria
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-08T19:18:12Z
dc.date.available2021-12-08T19:18:12Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.description.abstractHuman decision making is a process guided by different and partly competing motivations that can each dominate behavior and lead to different effects depending on strength and circumstances. `Over-stylizing' neglects such competing concerns and context-dependence, although it facilitates the emergence of elaborate general theories. We illustrate by examples from social dilemma experiments and inequality aversion theories that sweeping empirical claims should be avoided.de_DE
dc.identifier.urihttps://jlupub.ub.uni-giessen.de//handle/jlupub/416
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.22029/jlupub-349
dc.language.isoende_DE
dc.subject.ddcddc:100de_DE
dc.subject.ddcddc:330de_DE
dc.title(Over-)Stylizing Experimental Findings and Theorizing with Sweeping Generalityde_DE
dc.typearticlede_DE
dcterms.isPartOf2536124-7
local.affiliationExterne Einrichtungende_DE
local.source.epage249de_DE
local.source.journaltitleRationality, markets, and morals: RMMde_DE
local.source.spage239de_DE
local.source.volume0de_DE

Dateien

Originalbündel
Gerade angezeigt 1 - 1 von 1
Lade...
Vorschaubild
Name:
00_017_gueth_kliemt_levati.pdf
Größe:
100.41 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Beschreibung: