Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorUhl, Matthias
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-08T21:07:10Z
dc.date.available2021-12-08T21:07:10Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.urihttps://jlupub.ub.uni-giessen.de//handle/jlupub/447
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.22029/jlupub-380
dc.description.abstractThis experiment investigates whether protégés judge paternalism by means of its consequences or on principled grounds. Subjects receive a payment for showing up early the next morning. The later they show up the less they get. Protégés can self-commit to a specific show-up time or maintain spontaneity. By making this binary choice, protégés express their preference for liberty. Simultaneously, their patron is either paternalistic or liberal by making this choice on their behalf. We investigate whether self-committers’ willingness to restrict their own freedom predicts their attitudes toward paternalism.de_DE
dc.description.sponsorshipSonstige Drittmittelgeber/-innende_DE
dc.language.isoende_DE
dc.subject.ddcddc:100de_DE
dc.subject.ddcddc:330de_DE
dc.titleDo Self-Committers Mind Other-Imposed Commitment? An Experiment on Weak Paternalismde_DE
dc.typearticlede_DE
dcterms.isPartOf2536124-7
local.affiliationExterne Einrichtungende_DE
local.source.spage13de_DE
local.source.epage34de_DE
local.source.journaltitleRationality, markets, and morals: RMMde_DE
local.source.volume2de_DE


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record