Zur Kurzanzeige

dc.contributor.authorSugden, Robert
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-10T13:41:18Z
dc.date.available2021-12-10T13:41:18Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.urihttps://jlupub.ub.uni-giessen.de//handle/jlupub/483
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.22029/jlupub-412
dc.description.abstractI defend the claim, made in a previous paper, that `a Humean can be a contractarian', against the criticisms of Anthony de Jasay. Jasay makes a categorical distinction between `ordered anarchy' (which he associates with Hume) and `social contract theory'. I argue that Hume's political position was conservative, not anarchist. On Hume's analysis, a convention is an implicit agreement; the concept of convention is more general than, rather than distinct from, that of agreement by exchange of promises. Hume justifies political obligation by treating established forms of government as conventions in this sense.de_DE
dc.language.isoende_DE
dc.subjectcontractarianism,de_DE
dc.subjectsocial contract theoryde_DE
dc.subjectHumede_DE
dc.subjectordered anarchyde_DE
dc.subjectconventionde_DE
dc.subject.ddcddc:100de_DE
dc.subject.ddcddc:330de_DE
dc.titleContractarianism as a Broad Churchde_DE
dc.typearticlede_DE
dcterms.isPartOf2536124-7
local.affiliationExterne Einrichtungende_DE
local.source.spage61de_DE
local.source.epage66de_DE
local.source.journaltitleRationality, markets, and morals: RMMde_DE
local.source.volume4de_DE


Dateien zu dieser Ressource

Thumbnail

Das Dokument erscheint in:

Zur Kurzanzeige