Cycling Data for "Pouch Versus Press Cells – How Cell Configuration Dictates Low-Pressure Performance in Sulfide Solid-State Batteries"

dc.contributorHubl, Johannes
dc.contributorMinnmann, Philip
dc.contributorRossi, Federico
dc.contributorJi, Simon Si Ming
dc.contributorRichter, Felix H.
dc.contributorHatzell, Kelsey
dc.contributorEckhardt, Janis K.
dc.contributorBielefeld, Anja
dc.contributorJanek, Jürgen
dc.contributor.authorSchubert, Johannes
dc.contributor.authorKremer, Sascha
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-24T07:00:01Z
dc.date.issued2026-07
dc.description.abstractThis dataset contains electrochemical cycling data of pouch cells, press cells with pellet-type cathode and press-cells with sheet-type cathode. For more information please see the README.txt-file. Abstract of the underlying text publication: Sulfide-based solid-state batteries (SSBs) offer the potential for higher energy densities compared to state-of-the-art lithium-ion batteries. Although impressive electrochemical performance has already been demonstrated, these results are predominantly obtained under high stack pressures – up to hundreds of MPa. While such conditions are valuable for probing fundamental material properties and intrinsic performance limits, the resulting cell metrics are not easily transferable to practical applications. Consequently, there is a growing imperative for application-oriented evaluation of SSBs under more realistic, low-pressure conditions in the single-digit MPa range. In this study, we demonstrate that the assessment of low-pressure performance can be significantly influenced by the chosen cell architecture. By comparing the cycling performance of sulfide-based SSBs – utilizing an NMC composite cathode and an In/(InLi)x anode with argyrodite-type Li6PS5Cl as electrolyte – in both pouch-cell and presscell configurations, we reveal significant discrepancies in electrochemical performance at stack pressures ranging from 0 MPa to 25 MPa. Notably, the developed pouch cells exhibit vastly superior electrochemical performance at low stack pressures of 1 MPa compared to their press2 cell counterparts despite the same materials used. The dominant failure mechanisms at low stack pressure are investigated using three-electrode pouch cells. Overall, our findings emphasize that a realistic assessment of SSB cell performance requires practical cell architectures that mirror targeted applications.
dc.description.sponsorshipBundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF); ROR-ID:04pz7b180
dc.description.sponsorshipBundesländer
dc.identifier.urihttps://jlupub.ub.uni-giessen.de/handle/jlupub/21659
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.22029/jlupub-21003
dc.rightsAttribution-ShareAlike 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
dc.subjectsolid-state batteries
dc.subjectcycling data
dc.subject.ddcddc:540
dc.titleCycling Data for "Pouch Versus Press Cells – How Cell Configuration Dictates Low-Pressure Performance in Sulfide Solid-State Batteries"
dc.typeDataset
local.affiliationFB 08 - Biologie und Chemie

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Cycling_Data.zip
Size:
1.98 GB
Format:
Unknown data format
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
README.txt
Size:
1.22 KB
Format:
Plain Text

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
7.58 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections