(Over-)Stylizing Experimental Findings and Theorizing with Sweeping Generality
Lade...
Datum
Autor:innen
Betreuer/Gutachter
Weitere Beteiligte
Beteiligte Institutionen
Herausgeber
Zeitschriftentitel
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Bandtitel
Verlag
Zitierlink
Zusammenfassung
Human decision making is a process guided by different and partly competing motivations that can each dominate behavior and lead to different effects depending on strength and circumstances. `Over-stylizing' neglects such competing concerns and context-dependence, although it facilitates the emergence of elaborate general theories. We illustrate by examples from social dilemma experiments and inequality aversion theories that sweeping empirical claims should be avoided.Verknüpfung zu Publikationen oder weiteren Datensätzen
Beschreibung
Anmerkungen
Erstpublikation in
Rationality, markets, and morals: RMM 0 (2009), 239 - 249