Intestinal current measurement versus nasal potential difference measurements for diagnosis of cystic fibrosis : a case-control study

Datum

2014

Betreuer/Gutachter

Weitere Beteiligte

Herausgeber

Zeitschriftentitel

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Bandtitel

Verlag

Zusammenfassung

BACKGROUND:Nasal potential difference (NPD) and intestinal current measurement (ICM) are functional CFTR tests that are used as adjunctive diagnostic tools for cystic fibrosis (CF). Smoking has a systemic negative impact on CFTR function. A diagnostic comparison between NPD and ICM and the impact of smoking on both CFTR tests has not been done. METHODS:The sweat chloride test, NPD, and ICM were performed in 18 patients with CF (sweat chloride >60mmol/l), including 6 pancreatic sufficient (PS) patients, and 13 healthy controls, including 8 smokers. The NPD CFTR response to Cl-free and isoproterenol perfusion (Delta0Cl-+Iso) was compared to the ICM CFTR response to forskolin/IBMX, carbachol, and histamine (DeltaIsc, forskolin/IBMX+ carbachol+histamine). RESULTS:The mean NPD CFTR response and ICM CFTR response between patients with CF and healthy controls was significantly different (p <0.001), but not between patients with CF who were PS and those who were pancreatic insufficient (PI). Smokers have a decreased CFTR response measured by NPD (p=0.049). For ICM there is a trend towards decreased CFTR response (NS). Three healthy control smokers had NPD responses within the CF-range. In contrast to NPD, there was no overlap of the ICM response between patients with CF and controls. CONCLUSIONS:ICM is superior to NPD in distinguishing between patients with CF who have a sweat chloride>60mmol/l and healthy controls, including smokers. Neither NPD nor ICM differentiated between patients with CF who were PS from those who were PI. Smoking has a negative impact on CFTR function in healthy controls measured by NPD and challenges the diagnostic interpretation of NPD, but not ICM.

Beschreibung

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Anmerkungen

Erstpublikation in

undefined (2014)

Sammelband

Forschungsdaten

Schriftenreihe

Erstpublikation in

BMC Pulmonary Medicine 14(1):156

Zitierform