Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWismeijer, Dagmar A
dc.contributor.authorGegenfurtner, Karl R
dc.contributor.authorDrewing, Knut
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-12T07:58:44Z
dc.date.available2012-11-20T14:10:59Z
dc.date.available2023-06-12T07:58:44Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.urihttp://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:hebis:26-opus-90685
dc.identifier.urihttps://jlupub.ub.uni-giessen.de//handle/jlupub/17190
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.22029/jlupub-16568
dc.description.abstractWe studied whether vision can teach touch to the same extent as touch seems to teach vision. In a 2 x 2 between-participants learning study, we artificially correlated visual gloss cues with haptic compliance cues. In two "natural" tasks, we tested whether visual gloss estimations have an influence on haptic estimations of softness and vice versa. In two "new" tasks, in which participants were either asked to haptically judge glossiness or to visually judge softness, we investigated how perceptual estimates transfer from one sense to the other. Our results showed that vision does not teach touch as efficient as touch seems to teach vision.en
dc.language.isoende_DE
dc.rightsIn Copyright*
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/*
dc.subjecttouchen
dc.subjectvisionen
dc.subjectcue interactionen
dc.subjectgloss estimationen
dc.subject.ddcddc:150de_DE
dc.titleLearning from vision-to-touch is different than from touch-to-visionen
dc.typearticlede_DE
local.affiliationFB 06 - Psychologie und Sportwissenschaftde_DE
local.opus.id9068
local.opus.instituteAllgemeine Psychologiede_DE
local.opus.fachgebietPsychologiede_DE
local.source.freetextFrontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 2012, 6:105, 1-10; doi:10.3389/fnint.2012.00105de_DE


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

In Copyright