• Policy
    • FAQ JLUdocs
    • FAQ JLUdata
    • Publishing in JLUdocs
    • Publishing in JLUdata
    • Publishing Contract
    • English
    • Deutsch
View Item 
  •   JLUpub Home
  • JLUdocs
  • Publikationen im Open Access gefördert durch die UB
  • View Item
  •   JLUpub Home
  • JLUdocs
  • Publikationen im Open Access gefördert durch die UB
  • View Item
  • Info
    • Policy
    • FAQ JLUdocs
    • FAQ JLUdata
    • Publishing in JLUdocs
    • Publishing in JLUdata
    • Publishing Contract
  • English 
    • English
    • Deutsch
  • Login
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Hemodynamic response pattern of spatial cueing is different for social and symbolic cues

Thumbnail
Files in this item
10.3389_fnhum.2014.00912.pdf (857.6Kb)
Date
2014
Author
Lockhofen, Denise Elfriede Liesa
Gruppe, Harald
Ruprecht, Christoph
Gallhofer, Bernd
Sammer, Gebhard
Metadata
Show full item record
BibTeX Export
Quotable link
http://dx.doi.org/10.22029/jlupub-8522
Abstract

Directional social gaze and symbolic arrow cues both serve as spatial cues, causing seemingly reflexive shifts of an observer s attention. However, the underlying neural substrates remain a point at issue. The present study specifically addressed the differences in the activation patterns associated with non-predictive gaze and arrow cues, placing ... special emphasis on brain regions known to be involved in the processing of social information [superior temporal sulcus (STS), fusiform gyrus (FFG)]. Additionally, the functional connectivity of these brain regions with other areas involved in gaze processing and spatial attention was investigated. Results indicate that gaze and arrow cues recruit several brain regions differently, with gaze cues increasing activation in occipito-temporal regions and arrow cues increasing activation in occipito-parietal regions. Specifically, gaze cues in contrast to arrow cues enhanced activation in the FFG and the STS. Functional connectivity analysis revealed that during gaze cueing the STS was more strongly connected to the intraparietal sulcus (IPS) and the frontal eye fields, whereas the FFG was more strongly connected to the IPS and the amygdala.

URI of original publication
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00912
Collections
  • Publikationen im Open Access gefördert durch die UB
Namensnennung 3.0 International
Namensnennung 3.0 International

Contact Us | Impressum | Privacy Policy | OAI-PMH
 

 

Browse

All of JLUpubCommunities & CollectionsOrganisational UnitDDC-ClassificationPublication TypeAuthorsBy Issue DateThis CollectionOrganisational UnitDDC-ClassificationPublication TypeAuthorsBy Issue Date

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

Contact Us | Impressum | Privacy Policy | OAI-PMH