• Policy
    • FAQ JLUdocs
    • FAQ JLUdata
    • Publishing in JLUdocs
    • Publishing in JLUdata
    • Publishing Contract
    • English
    • Deutsch
View Item 
  •   JLUpub Home
  • JLUdocs
  • Publikationen im Open Access gefördert durch die UB
  • View Item
  •   JLUpub Home
  • JLUdocs
  • Publikationen im Open Access gefördert durch die UB
  • View Item
  • Info
    • Policy
    • FAQ JLUdocs
    • FAQ JLUdata
    • Publishing in JLUdocs
    • Publishing in JLUdata
    • Publishing Contract
  • English 
    • English
    • Deutsch
  • Login
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Anticipatory grasping control modulates somatosensory perception

Thumbnail
Files in this item
10.1167_19.5.4.pdf (447.1Kb)
Date
2019
Author
Voudouris, Dimitris
Broda, Maximilian Davide
Fiehler, Katja
Metadata
Show full item record
BibTeX Export
Quotable link
http://dx.doi.org/10.22029/jlupub-8914
Abstract

Somatosensory perception is hampered on the moving limb during a goal-directed movement. This somatosensory suppression is mostly attributed to a forward model that predicts future states of the system based on the established motor command. Here, we examined whether and how this suppression is modulated by the predictability of object features ... important for controlling a grasping movement. Participants reached to grasp an object between thumb and index finger and then lifted it as straight as possible. Objects with symmetric or asymmetric mass distributions were presented either in a blocked or random manner, so that the object´s mass distribution could be anticipated or not. At the moment of object contact, a brief vibrotactile stimulus of varying intensities was presented on the dorsal part of the moving index finger. Participants had to report whether they detected the stimulus. When the object´s mass distribution was predictable, contact points with the object were modulated to the object´s centre of mass. This modulation contributed to a minimized resultant object roll during lifting. When the object´s mass distribution was unpredictable, participants chose a default grasping configuration, resulting in greater object roll for asymmetric mass distributions. Somatosensory perception was hampered when grasping both types of objects compared to baseline (no-movement). Importantly, somatosensory suppression was stronger when participants could predict the object´s mass distribution. We suggest that the strength of somatosensory suppression depends on the predictability of movement-relevant object features.

URI of original publication
https://doi.org/10.1167/19.5.4
Collections
  • Publikationen im Open Access gefördert durch die UB
Namensnennung, Nicht kommerziell, keine Bearbeitung 4.0 International
Namensnennung, Nicht kommerziell, keine Bearbeitung 4.0 International

Contact Us | Impressum | Privacy Policy | OAI-PMH
 

 

Browse

All of JLUpubCommunities & CollectionsOrganisational UnitDDC-ClassificationPublication TypeAuthorsBy Issue DateThis CollectionOrganisational UnitDDC-ClassificationPublication TypeAuthorsBy Issue Date

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

Contact Us | Impressum | Privacy Policy | OAI-PMH