Asymptomatic multiple myeloma molecular background of progression, evolution, and prognosis

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Advisors/Reviewers

Further Contributors

Contributing Institutions

Publisher

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

License

Abstract

BackgroundAsymptomatic multiple myeloma (AMM) evolves from monoclonal gammopathy of unknown significance (MGUS) and progresses to symptomatic myeloma characterized by end organ damage. Here, three main questions are addressed: i) Which factors determine evolution and progression of asymptomatic myeloma, and what is their molecular background? ii) Is progression driven by ongoing molecular (clonal) evolution? iii) When to call a plasma cell malignant ? Methods CD138-purified plasma-cell samples of 2369 consecutive patients with MGUS (n=304), asymptomatic (n=432) and symptomatic myeloma (n=1633) were subjected to interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (n=31898 measurements), and of these n=951 (n=62 MGUS, n=259 AMM, and n=630 symptomatic myeloma) likewise to gene expression profiling (GEP). Sixty-five patients were followed longitudinally. Serum/urine samples (n=8398) allowed modelling plasma cell doubling time in AMM and MGUS (n=322, and n=196, respectively).ResultsAccumulation rate, tumor mass, and molecular characteristics determine progression to symptomatic myeloma. Progression-associated chromosomal aberrations are multiplicatively associated with myeloma cell doubling time, explaining their increasing frequency from MGUS to asymptomatic- to symptomatic myeloma. Their number, rather than single aberrations, determines progression. The developed GEP-based HDAMM-score predicts progression of AMM-, symptomatic and MGUS-patients, as scores for symptomatic patients predict AMM-progression. The bulk of altered gene expression is already present in MGUS-patients with minor subsequent differences to AMM and symptomatic myeloma. Longitudinal patient samples rarely (9%) show de-novo-appearance of progression-associated aberrations. In evolution and progression of AMM, doubling times (18.0/5.1 years) and number of doublings (0.62/0.92) are incompatible with common de novo appearance of progression-driving aberrations.ConclusionsEvolution and progression of AMM can be explained by accumulation rate, tumor mass and molecular characteristics without necessity of de novo appearance of genetic alterations. Plasma cells at MGUS-stage should be considered malignant and the letters US be dropped from MGUS .

Link to publications or other datasets

Description

Notes

Original publication in

Original publication in

Anthology

URI of original publication

Forschungsdaten

Series

Citation