Civil Society within Authoritarian Regimes: A Case for Positive Theorising

dc.contributor.advisorGawrich, Andrea
dc.contributor.advisorAbendschön, Simone
dc.contributor.authorNasibov, Murad
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-14T13:36:58Z
dc.date.available2025-01-14T13:36:58Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation investigates the dynamics of civil society within authoritarian regimes, challenging the dominance of normative frameworks that assess civil society against democratic ideals. Rejecting the “mirroring approach,” which relies on thickly normative comparisons to ideal benchmarks, the study adopts a positive theorising approach to uncover how civil society organisations (CSOs) navigate constraints and sustain autonomy. The research begins with a critical review of the literature, identifying four perspectives on civil society-authoritarian state relations: conflictual, cooperative adjustment, co-optative joinder, and symbiosis. Building on the symbiosis perspective, the study examines the role of formal institutionalisation in shaping CSO autonomy, understood as the strategic balancing of transnational ties and ties to the state, operationalised across financial and institutional dimensions. The empirical analysis is based on original survey data from CSOs in Russia and Turkey, representing hardliner and moderate autocracies, respectively. Findings reveal a “diffused effect” of formal institutionalisation: while aspects like professionalisation and formal commitment enhance institutional autonomy, rationalisation and bureaucratisation, unlike hierarchy, may constrain financial autonomy. In turn, formal commitment is determined by bureaucratisation and hierarchy. These effects are further moderated by the intensity of authoritarian rule – the regime variable. By bridging macro-level civil sphere theory with micro-level organisational analysis, the dissertation provides a fresh perspective on how CSOs manage interdependencies under authoritarian conditions. It critiques the reliance on normative judgments and descriptive inference in existing research and advocates for theory-driven, empirically testable explanations. In doing so, it advances an organisational theory of civil society that highlights the internal dynamics of CSOs and their interactions with broader societal structures.
dc.description.sponsorshipSonstige Drittmittelgeber/-innen
dc.description.sponsorshipDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG); ROR-ID:018mejw64
dc.identifier.urihttps://jlupub.ub.uni-giessen.de/handle/jlupub/20088
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.22029/jlupub-19443
dc.language.isoen
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectcivil society
dc.subjectauthoritarian regimes
dc.subjectorganisation theory
dc.subjectcivil sphere
dc.subjectautocracies
dc.subjectcivil society organisations
dc.subject.ddcddc:320
dc.subject.ddcddc:300
dc.titleCivil Society within Authoritarian Regimes: A Case for Positive Theorising
dc.typedoctoralThesis
dcterms.dateAccepted2024-07-16
local.affiliationFB 03 - Sozial- und Kulturwissenschaften
thesis.levelthesis.doctoral

Dateien

Originalbündel
Gerade angezeigt 1 - 1 von 1
Lade...
Vorschaubild
Name:
NasibovMurad-2024-07-16.pdf
Größe:
4.4 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Lizenzbündel
Gerade angezeigt 1 - 1 von 1
Vorschaubild nicht verfügbar
Name:
license.txt
Größe:
7.58 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Beschreibung: