Comparative Genomic Prediction in Winter Wheat

dc.contributor.advisorZenke-Philippe, Carola
dc.contributor.advisorFrisch, Matthias
dc.contributor.advisorSnowdon, Rod J.
dc.contributor.authorDifabachew, Yohannes Fekadu
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-05T08:10:11Z
dc.date.available2025-02-05T08:10:11Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractHaplotype blocks offer potential advantages over single SNP markers in genomic prediction by capturing local epistatic interactions and ancestral relationships. However, their effectiveness varies by trait and block construction method. This study evaluates genomic prediction for 11 traits in winter wheat using haplotype blocks constructed based on linkage disequilibrium (LD), fixed SNP numbers, fixed lengths in cM, and HaploBlocker, alongside single SNP markers. Data from 361 genotypes and single-year field trials were analyzed using ridge regression best linear unbiased prediction (RR-BLUP), restricted maximum likelihood ANOVA (RMLA), and genomic and variance component based on haplotype blocks (GVCHAP) in a cross-validation study. LD-based blocks showed the highest prediction accuracies for resistance traits (Blumeria graminis, Puccinia triticina, and Fusarium graminearum), while HaploBlocker outperformed other methods for protein concentration and resistances to Septoria tritici and P. striiformis. Machine learning methods were also assessed for their potential to improve prediction accuracy and resistance genotype identification. Nineteen prediction approaches, combining different models (RR-BLUP, RMLA, Bayesian ordinal regression, support vector machine, gradient boosting machine, and random forest), predictors (SNPs, LD-based blocks, autoencoder variables, and GWAS-selected SNPs), and response values (untransformed and logit transformed scores), were evaluated using cross-validation and Cohen’s κ. While RR-BLUP consistently performed well, gradient boosting machine and random forest achieved higher accuracy for P. triticina (0.71 vs. 0.64 for RR-BLUP). Cohen’s κ was used to assess the ability of each method to correctly identify the most resistant genotypes, demonstrating that machine learning models offered improvements in resistance identification, especially for P. triticina. A major finding is that no single method or predictor set universally outperforms others. The choice of model and predictors must be tailored to the genetic architecture of the trait being studied. Logit transformation proves particularly useful for resistance scores, ensuring that predicted genotypic values remain within an interpretable range. This thesis underscores the importance of a trait-specific approach to genomic prediction, emphasizing that effective prediction relies on selecting models and predictors that align with the unique characteristics of the traits.
dc.description.sponsorshipFederal States
dc.identifier.urihttps://jlupub.ub.uni-giessen.de/handle/jlupub/20226
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.22029/jlupub-19581
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.hasparthttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1168547
dc.relation.hasparthttps://doi.org/10.1111/pbr.13235
dc.relation.urihttps://github.com/czp-jlu/haploblocks
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectGenomic Prediction
dc.subjectMachine Learning
dc.subjectCross-validation
dc.subject.ddcddc:630
dc.titleComparative Genomic Prediction in Winter Wheat
dc.typedoctoralThesis
dcterms.dateAccepted2024-12-04
local.affiliationFB 09 - Agrarwissenschaften, Ökotrophologie und Umweltmanagement
local.projectFKZ 2818403A18
thesis.levelthesis.doctoral

Dateien

Originalbündel

Gerade angezeigt 1 - 1 von 1
Lade...
Vorschaubild
Name:
DifabachewYohannes-2024-12-04.pdf
Größe:
5.59 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Lizenzbündel

Gerade angezeigt 1 - 1 von 1
Lade...
Vorschaubild
Name:
license.txt
Größe:
7.58 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Beschreibung: