Aufgrund von Wartungsarbeiten kann es morgen, 19.06.2024 in der Zeit von 09:00-10:00 Uhr zu Problemen bei der Erreichbarkeit des Systems kommen. Wir bitten um Verständnis. | Due to maintenance work, there may be problems with the accessibility of the system tomorrow, 19.06.2024 from 09:00-10:00. We ask for your understanding.
 

Individual Interest and Political Legitimacy

Datum

2009

Betreuer/Gutachter

Weitere Beteiligte

Herausgeber

Zeitschriftentitel

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Bandtitel

Verlag

Lizenz

Zusammenfassung

Criticism of contract theory has always played an important role in Hartmut Kliemt's writings on political philosophy. Notwithstanding his objections to a consent-based justification of the state he has never subscribed to an anarchist position. In Hartmut Kliemt's view, a minimal state which protects the basic liberties of its citizens has to be considered legitimate. The article begins with a brief restatement of the most influential objections that have been raised against the various forms of contract theory. Thereafter interestbased accounts of political legitimacy are critically examined; it is argued that individual interests fail to provide a justification for any kind of political authority. Finally, philosophical anarchism is suggested as a possible alternative to contract theory and interest theory. Although philosophical anarchism holds that no state has a moral right to rule, it can be reconciled with the view that it is in the individual's interest to create and maintain a minimal state.

Beschreibung

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Anmerkungen

Erstpublikation in

Rationality, markets, and morals: RMM 0 (2009), 273 - 286

Sammelband

URI der Erstpublikation

Forschungsdaten

Schriftenreihe

Erstpublikation in

Zitierform